Comments for mishmashmoo

Comment on error checking in loadrunner by admin

admin — Tue, 20 Mar 2012 12:54:42 +0000

@Barry
Hey Barry,
You dont have to define it. web_reg_find, in its nature, just looks for the text, and either returns a true or false, or in this case, the number of times (savecount) it was found.
It makes it very easy to use the result with confirming if something was found or not, without failing the script, but you can get it to fail with the options that LR gives you.
You can specify Fail if found, or fail if not found etc. So you can use it for negative assurance like web_reg_find ERROR or something like that.
Alternatively you can do a web_reg_save_param and set it to Warning, so it doesn’t fail, but I dont like that because if it does not find the value, the parameter is not declared. Which means you cant evaluate it, or you will get a C runtime error.
Just look up the help in vugen for more info on this sort of stuff, its fairly detailed.
Cheers

Comment on error checking in loadrunner by Barry

Barry — Tue, 20 Mar 2012 12:24:16 +0000

This is great. Not sure if you ar monitoring but, do I have to define the parameter that is used in the web_reg_find ? If so, what is the type for the parameter.

Thanks

Comment on loadrunner error :: The user files were not transferred to the local load generator by admin

admin — Thu, 16 Feb 2012 23:02:55 +0000

@arun singh
Arun, its not the name of the script
I’ve had this happen on short name scripts also. The issue is caused to the problems described in the blog.
The reason it worked for you is because you saved a copy of the script. This often fixes the issue.

Comment on loadrunner error :: The user files were not transferred to the local load generator by arun singh

arun singh — Thu, 16 Feb 2012 22:00:53 +0000

This could be because of your script file name is very long or is kept under a very long folder list. for example

c:\xys\wee\dede\folder2\folder3\etc\lrscrip.usr
change it to c:\lrscrip.usr
It worked for me.

Comment on sitescope 10.0 integration with loadrunner 9.0 by admin

admin — Wed, 16 Nov 2011 02:27:09 +0000

If I wer you ZJ, I would remove the login/password prompt so you can get to it. Is that a solution?
Otherwise I think you can fudge the url to send the user/password example “http://user:password@sitescopeurl:8888″
Give that a go. Cheers

Comment on sitescope 10.0 integration with loadrunner 9.0 by zj

zj — Wed, 16 Nov 2011 02:21:23 +0000

xboxer21 :We have a sitescope 10.11 instance running, I want to use that instance in LR 9.5. I can get to the Topaz XML only if I’m authenticated if not I get a dialog box asking for username & password. Do you think its possible to use that with LR 9.5 or do we have to use the lite version of sitescope that comes bundled with LR. Thanks

@xboxer21

Comment on loadrunner controller – invalid action by Alex

Alex — Wed, 24 Aug 2011 19:48:46 +0000

Thanks a lot! You really saved so much of my time!!

Comment on random numbers & words by Speedmaster

Speedmaster — Tue, 10 May 2011 17:54:49 +0000

That was helpful, thanks!

Comment on loadrunner error :: The user files were not transferred to the local load generator by Mukesh

Mukesh — Mon, 18 Apr 2011 05:52:13 +0000

In my case I am using the QC for storing the files, so when I select in controller, I cannot find the “prm” files in Controller or QC.

If you have any idea to resolve this please share.

Thanks
Mukesh

Comment on random numbers & words by Eva

Eva — Wed, 06 Apr 2011 22:24:50 +0000

I used the random word in qtp function you created and it works like a charm! Thanks.